Showing posts with label National Government. Show all posts
Showing posts with label National Government. Show all posts

Sunday, March 29, 2020

A Fresh Approach


Theo normally writes on this blog, but today Colin Stokes, who grew up in the Second World War and its aftermath, gives his thoughts on Covid-19, and whether a National Government is the way forward.


The Problem


Here we are in the centre of a pandemic; something I never thought would write. Through the years we have somehow manged countless worrying situations – most of which have been human-made: banks going bust; 3-day week; interest rates at over 15%; business shut downs; industrial change; increases in poverty, and so on.

But this time the situation is different. It is nature fighting back against the human world, a world failing to realise that it was built by destroying nature. This is a situation being spread by travel – air and sea – spread by crowds together, spread by a simple cough.

The nearest I can remember witnessing anything like this was when we had a world war. But then that was man-made as well, and it was a world problem, not a UK problem or a family problem. We were all involved in the fight then, as now, but there was much less responsibility then. We couldn't change the war ourselves. This time even that is different. If we don't self-isolate, we could end a life.


The British Solution?


So this is a new situation. We are challenged by it, but so are our leaders. How should they respond? What does Boris Johnson do?

We must remember that in all great historical crises there's never a magic map of what to do. It seems like there should be, but each problem is different and requires unique responses. This time is no different. There is no easy answer. But history may help.

Our political system is set up to be constantly confrontational; the opposition must argue, debate and question against the government, who in turn fight back. It is not set up to deal with a problem that requires unity - a pandemic, least of all. So how do we overcome the lack of compromise, and forge a united parliament?

At the top of all the British political parties are well-meaning individuals with great intellectual capacity. Of course, you may not agree with many, or maybe none, of them. But the reality is they are our leaders. Voted in, and responsible. They must take charge. Yet the current system means that either side can only ever command about half of the country. Half of the brains and backing are out of reach.

This cannot stand. In the last world crisis the UK faced, it was Labour who, in tandem with Churchill, created a 'government of national unity'. A government where all parties worked together, took up cabinet posts together, and abstained from fighting each other in favour of a greater goal. Winston Churchill is (rightly) remembered as the front-man, but it was a team which saved us from the Nazis.

For instance, in the first war cabinet were Conservatives Churchill, Neville Chamberlain and Lord Halifax, with Labour MPs Clement Attlee and Arthur Greenwood. It was these key figures who first set the country on its path to victory.

And never since has the call been so strong for a united front, drawing from all the depth of British public service. Imagine Labour stalwarts such as Hilary Benn and Yvette Cooper working alongside Rishi Sunak and Michael Gove, pooling their experience and dedication, creating a consensus to respond to this crisis. Instead, we have Corbyn on the sidelines, watching, as the government implements the exact policies he promised in the 2019 election.

The wartime coalition locked in the critics looking for political gain, and meant all those in Westminster and Whitehall were focused on a common goal: victory. Every voter was represented. Every opinion was heard. 100% of the effort was aimed at solving the problem.


And that is what we need right now.

Despite their differences, will Boris realise this is the moment to reach across the divide, and have the humility to ask for Labour's help?

He is being lauded as a capable Prime Minister for his response so far to Coronavirus, but this is a crisis which will keep on rolling and he'll need all the help he can get before long.

It's time to stop being a good PM, and to become a great man.

It's time to call a National Government.


CTS 20/03/27



Thursday, May 03, 2018

A Government of National Unit- Wait what?

Brexit looks set to have a tumultuous impact on the UK and our government. The current leadership, with a majority of -10 and no fresh ideas on our future, needs help. Why not form a coalition of National Unity?


The Plaid Green Labouril ConservaUKIP Scottish Unionist Party


Tory Churchill (middle-right) and Labour Attlee (middle-left)
in the WWII coalition.
The last time such a union happened was during World War Two, when the Liberals, Labour, and the Conservatives (the only three parties in parliament) formed a unified coalition under Winston Churchill. 

They, and he, saw the need for a robust government, free from opposition squabbling and petty disputes. 

They were committed to organising the country into a state of war, and then maintaining that state, until either they or Hitler were defeated; totally and absolutely.



Brexit isn’t nearly as concerning as the fate of the Northern Hemisphere, but a unified government would be useful. The Commons is fractured by intense debate, and Theresa May is under pressure from all quarters regarding her policies. A united government would be largely free of this and could solve several big political problems:

    • Lack of committment to Brexit. With under a year left until exit, and less than eight months until the legislation has to be signed, cabinet ministers are falling like skittles (the bowling pins, not the sweets) and Jeremy Corbyn is grappling with an unkillable anti-semitism probe. Brexit is an awkward afterthought.

    Theresa May in human mode.
    • An absence of fresh ideas. The Maybot is known for a lack of human personality and dynamic thinking. Bringing in young Labour MPs and SNP ministers would shake up thinking (and amuse the country as they try to work with Jacob Rees-Mogg).

    • Dodging of serious questions, and scores of petty disputes. Who cares about chlorinated chicken, when we could end up with no chicken? There’s too much obsession over the detail even without a grand plan yet in place. A national government would force solutions to big issues (i.e. the customs union) with the little problems shelved for a rainy day.

    • Lack of Centrist politics. Abandoned by a Conservative party pulled to the right, and ignored by Corbynism, British Centrism is empty (Lib dems and Greens hardly count). Forcing more moderate MPs together might encourage them to redevelop the middle of British politics.

    By one reckoning, the Conservatives have swung to an almost extremist viewpoint.
    Labour is also much further out than before under Miliband, Brown, and Blair.

    An all-party coalition that solves at least one of these problems would be well worth the time - something Theresa May isn’t using well right now. 

    Economically, too, it could help reassure investor confidence, which currently looks wobbly at best. Showing that the government has its act together, and is committed to a functional Brexit, would result in a much more stable business atmosphere. 


    Business confidence isn't as poor as many make it out,
     but it still looks more vulnerable than it should be.


    And of course, it would encourage us. Both those who voted for and against Brexit now need guarantees that the exit will be carried out in a professional manner. I can’t think of many ways to reassure better than a national alliance.



    Westminister - I think we got a problem


    Unfortunately, there’s a reason why this idea has only been raised on the political fringes - the practicality of such a measure isn’t great. Hard-Right Brexiters mixing with Socialists? Tom Watson allying with Sir Bill Cash?

    How would the Liberal Democrats, so committed to the idea of, at least, a Common’s vote on the final plan, work with a Prime Minister who frequently disregards parliamentary opinion? 

    Corbyn-May relations are all an all-time low too; Prime Minister’s Questions’ has been knocking lumps out of them both recently, with fierce exchanges over Windrush, austerity and anti-semitism. It’s hard to imagine this gap being bridged, and it  probably never will be.


    This would be nice...
    ...but this is the reality,


    The idea of Winston Churchill being Prime Minister raised scorn and worry in most circles. Yet he disproved critics and went on to secure remarkable victories, both politically and militarily.

    A National Government is, yes, unlikely, and causes concern in some circles. But we aren’t in the position right now to throw away the possibility. Britain needs it. 

    You! Yeah, you! We reckon you're gonna love this stuff as well...